There are some days where I really wish I was an ALP member so I could call up their headquarters and resign in disgust. Last Thursday had to bring one of those strongest feelings.
The ALP leadership turmoil has been one of the most frustrating politic sagas I have ever seen. Not because it鈥檚 happening, nor because I think Kevin Rudd should go quietly into the shadows, but because of the complete lack of substance around the turmoil in the first place.
At the end of last week there were Julia Gillard supporters across the web cheering on how she had managed to 鈥榟old off鈥� another challenge. We were told that Gillard has won three challenges now with great margins. Compare that to Tony Abbott, who only won his by one vote, and you can see a woman of great strength and character.
This analysis misses the real point about leadership challenges, and the point of governing. When people criticise Tony Abbott for his leadership spill, questioning why he doesn鈥檛 get as criticised as much as Julia Gillard for hers, I think they are missing an essential element – that the Abbott challenge was all about policy, and had nothing to do with politics. Abbott wasn鈥檛 happy with the policy direction of the Coalition, and took up the challenge to see an ideological shift in the party.
Gillard鈥檚 prime ministership has never had anything like this to hang off. Her challenge was based on personality and polling, and nothing to do with policy. And whilst she determined to 鈥榝ix鈥� issues like asylum seekers, the mining tax and climate change, she never provided any ideological reasons for these 鈥榝ixes鈥� – they were all political.
That is what I see to be one of the major problems of Gillard鈥檚 term of leadership – a complete lack of ideological substance. Now many will come back and say 鈥榮he has passed so much legislation鈥�, and that is great. The country continues to function. But whilst the government has been passing legislation, there has been no true ideological basis behind any of it. The rise of Gillard – and the fall of Rudd – was all about power, and nothing to do with an ideological shift.
And the end of last week I felt a strange depression about the result of the Labor turmoil. On reflection, I think I can pin point this down to a shift I鈥檝e seen in the Labor Party since they were elected in 2007 – a shift from a substantive desire to overturn Howard era policies, to one based solely on staying in power – internally and externally. It is the depressive nature of the ALP turmoil.
