Here’s how marriage equality in Australia could be a reality within weeks
Image: Dean Smith. Image: Facebook.
Marriage聽equality has been a longstanding聽hot topic in Australia, but renewed pressures within and outside of parliament have suggested that it could be passed as soon as this month.
Here’s the rundown on how that could happen.
When the Liberal Party returns to parliament next week the issue of marriage equality is likely to arise.聽If the party room debates and agrees to a free vote, same-sex marriage would likely pass聽both chambers.
If not, Senators Dean Smith and Trent Zimmerman, who are both advocates for a free vote on same-sex marriage, have reportedly they will likely introduce. This bill contains religious exemptions, which is worth noting.
While the bill聽will almost certainly pass the Senate, in order for it聽to pass the lower house a handful of Liberals including openly gay Queensland MP聽Trevor Evans, Warren Entsch, and Tim Wilson聽have suggested they might聽cross the floor to ensure it.
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, who聽has held firm that a plebiscite was the way to go on the issue, said on Monday that backbenchers 鈥渉ave always had the right to cross the floor鈥�.
Yet another leadership spill is rumoured if Liberals cross the floor for聽marriage equality.
Unnamed sourced have called Turnbull鈥檚 leadership 鈥渢erminal鈥� if pro鈥搈arriage equality Liberal MPs aren鈥檛 kept in line, and a聽spill could mean Peter Dutton replacing Turnbull as Prime Minister.
Trevor Evans spoke against the proposed plebiscite, saying a free vote in parliament is the way forward for marriage equality.
鈥淚鈥檇 like to think that the government can take control of the agenda and organise a parliamentary vote on our terms and resolve this matter in a businesslike fashion,鈥� he said.
If enough MPs believe in marriage equality, it is possible that Australia could have same-sex marriage as early as next week.
Advocacy group GetUp! has launched a new urging Australians who want marriage equality to their local MPs to make their voices heard ahead of a potential parliamentary vote.
Yes, churches are allowed exemptions but ‘race’ is not one of those.
Second, as a man who is travelling to NZ in 1 1/2 weeks to marry my partner, which I am so excited about, I think can speak from the sharp end of the pointy blade – we would not and would you really want to force any church to marry 2 people who are in love as they would do so only because of the law instead of because they believe it the right thing to do.
If we want to right to marry then we should allow those who do not agree to disagree but in a respectful manner. We see them as bigots, they see themselves as spiritual believers. Us and they are never going to agree unless we are willing to find a compromised middle ground.
In the Bill proposed, it will not exempt a person who holds a religious belief from denying access to any supply of wedding products unless it, the entity belongs somehow to a church, eg a hall next door.
Scott
“This bill contains religious exemptions, which is worth noting.”
I’m curious as to the extent of the religious exemptions. If it means churches have total say over whom they do and don’t marry, that’s nothing new. As it is today, churches can decline to marry straight couples for any reason they like – it would be totally legal for a church to say to a mixed race couple “we don’t believe in mixed race marriage” and there would be no recourse. Churches are allowed to be bigoted and hateful and marriage equality isn’t going to change their right to be revolting people.
If the religious exemptions extend to retail establishments (bakers, caterers, function centres etc) then that’s bullshit. It could contribute to a massive rise in sectarianism, which was a big issue in what Pauline Hanson calls the good old days.