Homophobic election pamphlets rife in Queensland
With the dust of last weekend鈥檚 federal election almost settled and results soon to be finalised, many in the community are questioning the impact that highly evocative and fervently anti-gay advertising had on the national poll, and Queensland in particular.
Whilst all states were subjected to a varying degree of anti-gay and anti-marriage equality political ads from groups not officially affiliated with the major parties, Queensland appears to have had more than its share, with voters in the northern state electorates of Lilley, Petrie, Brisbane, Herbert and Moreton were all subjected to highly evocative pamphlets and even newspaper advertising that has been described as “harmful,” “fear mongering” and “hurtful”.
People in the seat of Moreton were the recipients of a controversial flyer prominently featuring an image of a highly distressed child crying out “I want my mum and dad”.
After stating that the Rudd government wanted to enact same-sex marriage by December 2013, the flyer continued to read: 鈥淟oving kids and respecting their rights means keeping marriage law that puts kids鈥� needs first鈥�.
鈥淲hen 鈥榞ay and lesbian marriage鈥� is taught in kindy and school, children will be led to believe that: kids have no right to both mum and dad, parents who disagree are bigots.鈥�
National spokesperson for Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG) labelled the anti-gay advertising as 鈥榟urtful鈥�.
“The flyers suggest that it is bad for children to be raised by same-sex couples, which I believe breaches anti-discrimination law,” Argent said.
“Same-sex couples and their families deserve the same support and respect as other couples, not this kind of denigration.”
Australian Marriage Equality national director Rodney Croome accused distributors of the pamphlets and ads of stirring up hate.
鈥溾�淭hese flyers use objectionable images of children and false information from the US to stir up fear and hate against marriage equality and those Liberal, Labor and Independent candidates who support it,鈥� Croome said.
鈥淭he flyers will have a particularly harmful impact on young gay people coming to terms with their sexuality and on the children being raised by same-sex couples.鈥�
Whilst those responsible for the homophobic campaigns appear to be unaffiliated with the major parties, the address featured on the flyer distributed in the seat of Moreton is that of the offices of the National Civic Council Queensland, a group associated with the Australian Family Association who is responsible for 鈥楴ational Marriage Day鈥�.
PFLAG said that they will be seeking legal advice about the Moreton flyer.
I do not believe that I am “homophobic” any more than I am “misogynistic”. However, I support retaining the existing (and traditional) definition of “marriage” as being between one man and one woman. That doesn’t mean I am automatically opposed to the creation of new kinds of registered, committed and life-long relationship (and no I don’t want to call it “civil partnership” any more than you do).
The trouble with much of the discussion is that it rapidly becomes emotional and biased, without a clear and unambiguous set of terms agreed by all participants in the discussion.
* “legalise gay marriage” isn’t the same as “legalise marijuana use” – it’s not something that people do now, but if they’re caught they get charged with a crime and fined or jailed.
* “marriage equality” suggests there are unequal marriages. As the law stands now, “marriage” means “the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life.”
* “redefine marriage” means to change the definition in section 5 of the Marriage Act 1961.
It is hurtful to all, and to a free and open discussion, to label people who have different views as homophobic, dinosaurs, or out of touch. Australia will be a better place if we can openly discuss our differences, with respect and honesty.
The term ‘Marriage Equality’, in the way it’s used now, is nothing more than a misleading catchphrase obviously dreamed up by some PR or advertising firm. It’s currently only being used to refer to the introduction of legal marriage between same sex partners but there are many other minority groups who are denied the right to be legally married. Two obvious examples are intra-familial and polyamorous relationships.
True marriage equality will be when all consenting adults, regardless of their form of relationship, are legally entitled to have their relationship recognised and legitimised through marriage. Supporting anything less than that and labelling it ‘marriage equality’ is not only dishonest but highlights inherent bigotry in the activist.