Comments on: Why Queensland’s LGBTI community needs a Greens MP

By: Ruxxy

Ruxxy — Mon, 09 Feb 2015 06:09:31 +0000

If the answer is a Greenie you know its a very silly question.

By: Steve

Steve — Wed, 04 Feb 2015 09:48:55 +0000

When I think of the Greens my skin crawls.These Nimbies should stick to saving Whales,I’ll never forget the Greens and their “Love” for the Carbon Tax…

By: Paul Terrett

Paul Terrett — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:00:52 +0000

In reply to Chad Weston. Just like the Greens who wlant us to live in caves eating berries

By: Paul Terrett

Paul Terrett — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 07:56:29 +0000

In reply to Paul Terrett. The major parties consider broader community opinion rather than a vocal minority.

By: Sym Puskaric

Sym Puskaric — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:16:08 +0000

In reply to Paul Terrett. But it makes them think twice about what they do legislate if they see people start backing them.

By: Sym Puskaric

Sym Puskaric — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:14:55 +0000

In reply to Chad Weston.

By: Paul Terrett

Paul Terrett — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:12:43 +0000

In reply to Paul Terrett. 2 mps does not make legislative change with out the support of the major parties

By: Sym Puskaric

Sym Puskaric — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:11:12 +0000

In reply to Paul Terrett. Incidentally, two greens were just recently voted in to Victoria's lower house. How is that a waste? I would rather have representation for what I want than give my vote to LNP.

By: Paul Terrett

Paul Terrett — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:10:08 +0000

In reply to Chad Weston. It was not the Greens who created national parks and environmental protections. The Greens are against the human environment.

By: Sym Puskaric

Sym Puskaric — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:06:59 +0000

In reply to Paul Terrett. Why?

By: Sym Puskaric

Sym Puskaric — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:06:10 +0000

In reply to Chad Weston. I'm sure they would legislate to help the environment rather than destroy it.

By: Paul Terrett

Paul Terrett — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:01:44 +0000

In reply to Michael Donato. The Greens will never deliver change for our community

By: Paul Terrett

Paul Terrett — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:00:48 +0000

In reply to Chad Weston. The Greens take corporate donations.

By: Paul Terrett

Paul Terrett — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 05:59:18 +0000

In reply to Paul Terrett. Yes optional preferential. You may as well give the LNP or ALP your vote or exhaust you vote, rather than give your vote to the Greens.

By: Sym Puskaric

Sym Puskaric — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 05:54:38 +0000

In reply to Paul Terrett. This is not true. That's why we have a preferential voting system.

By: Sym Puskaric

Sym Puskaric — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 05:53:17 +0000

In reply to Chad Weston. Do we really have to sacrifice the planet by voting for corporate backed parties who only care about money?

By: Chad Weston

Chad Weston — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 05:26:17 +0000

Do we really have to sacrifice the economy for it though by voting for the halfwit greens

By: Paul Terrett

Paul Terrett — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 04:03:25 +0000

A vote for the Greens is a wasted vote. The major parties are the only ones who can change legislation.

By: Paul of Forbes NSW

Paul of Forbes NSW — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 03:20:25 +0000

As I the only one who finds it very strange and confusing, that the Queensland Labor party policy openly supports marriage equality, but will not have a policy on adoption equality – under the Queensland Adoption Act 2009?????

By: Rob Speirs

Rob Speirs — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 03:15:26 +0000

go the greens