Comments on: Separate and unequal /opinion/soapbox-opinion/separate-and-unequal/5591 Setting Australia’s LGBTI agenda since 1979 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:15:21 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.5 By: Ronson (Katoomba) /opinion/soapbox-opinion/separate-and-unequal/5591#comment-12469 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:15:21 +0000 https://starobserver.com.au/?p=5591#comment-12469 And now New York too:

]]> By: Mike /opinion/soapbox-opinion/separate-and-unequal/5591#comment-12449 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:53:18 +0000 https://starobserver.com.au/?p=5591#comment-12449 You forgot New Hampshire and Maine in the list that are debating to indroduce SSM as well!!!

]]> By: Paul /opinion/soapbox-opinion/separate-and-unequal/5591#comment-12442 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:24:08 +0000 https://starobserver.com.au/?p=5591#comment-12442 Kevin Rudd is stuck in the 17th century on marriage as usual!!! As I have said numerous times if it is good for 4 states in the US [MA, CT, VT and IA], Canada, South Africa, Sweden, Holland, Belgium, Norway, Spain, Nepal – then is is surly good enough for Australia!! “Rudd is a Dudd, he has a rubber butt and everytime he says marriage is between a man and a woman it goes put-put”

]]>