Comments on: Fanning fear in the marriage debate /opinion/soapbox-opinion/fanning-fear-in-the-marriage-debate/64988 Setting Australia’s LGBTI agenda since 1979 Sat, 05 Nov 2011 06:13:15 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.5 By: Baz /opinion/soapbox-opinion/fanning-fear-in-the-marriage-debate/64988#comment-84872 Sat, 05 Nov 2011 06:13:15 +0000 https://starobserver.com.au/?p=64988#comment-84872 I’m 51 years old and not afraid to say this Emperor is stark naked! My current peeve is that those Kardashians get millions for making a mockery of marriage whereas my sterling efforts here and elsewhere never get a cent!
Seriously though, I’m not against ‘gay’ marriage. In fact make it as GAY as you can. But that’s not what is being lobbied for. Someone said to me “I don’t want a gay wedding anymore than my brother had a straight wedding.” Really? Since when were weddings meant to be a denial of sex or sexuality? As if it’s something to be ashamed of.
Another said to me “I want my 12 year relationship to be legitimate.” Huh! It’s the 21st century and this is how some gays still see themselves? I would never say a same-sex relationship was not legitimate, yet I’m a traitor for not supporting gay marriage? No, I say if you adopt the language of conservatives to label our relationships illegitimate then you just might be the traitor.
I take a hard line against marriage to hopefully jolt people out of this self-defeating negativity. I hope that’s what Dennis Altman was trying to do in his speech too. Interesting that he doesn’t mention marriage, it has to be inferred. He wants us to look at the big picture. The focus on marriage is so small people have lost perspective. Civil unions won’t do. Nor relationship registers. It must be marriage. It must be called marriage. It must be exactly what heterosexuals have. And this stringent definition is called equality. Yet when the conservatives and religious assert their definitions it’s called bigotry. Put some clothes on Your Excellency!

]]>
By: Rohan /opinion/soapbox-opinion/fanning-fear-in-the-marriage-debate/64988#comment-84466 Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:48:12 +0000 https://starobserver.com.au/?p=64988#comment-84466 I think there’s a distinction to be made here. Gays not “agreeing” with gay marriage is not the same as personally not wanting it for themselves. If a gay person allows their own feelings about marriage as an institution to inform their view as to whether ANY gay person should be given the right to get married, they are no better than religious opponents of gay marriage who expect the rest of us to conform to their religious beliefs.

If you are a gay person who believes gays should not have the right to get married, you are an enemy of the gay rights movement, period.

I am gay and personally don’t wish to ever get married but I still would fight for the rights of other gays who want marriage for themselves. It is a matter of principle and equality.

I am a fan of Rachel Maddow and I read her comments about this topic. I’m certain she’d be the first to clarify that her comments weren’t meant to be interpreted as an argument against gay people having the right to marry but merely an argument about why marriage need not necessarily be embraced by the gay community.

]]>
By: dax /opinion/soapbox-opinion/fanning-fear-in-the-marriage-debate/64988#comment-84360 Thu, 03 Nov 2011 07:50:02 +0000 https://starobserver.com.au/?p=64988#comment-84360 Well said Dave..xx

I believe it should be about freedom of choice.

]]>
By: Derek McCue /opinion/soapbox-opinion/fanning-fear-in-the-marriage-debate/64988#comment-84349 Thu, 03 Nov 2011 07:06:26 +0000 https://starobserver.com.au/?p=64988#comment-84349 I think marriage is a redundant issue, be it same sex or otherwise. The dominance of SSM as an issue just demonstrates how middle class and self interested gay activism has become. The real battle lays in defending and extending secularism.here are so many more issues that are more important not least of these the state murder and incarceration of homosexuals in the developing world. The christian faiths and Islam are both pushing a “moral” worldview which is stultified and limited.

]]>
By: Dave /opinion/soapbox-opinion/fanning-fear-in-the-marriage-debate/64988#comment-84223 Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:15:49 +0000 https://starobserver.com.au/?p=64988#comment-84223 Steady on, most older members of our community grew up hoping to shag and not go to jail, so I can see how Marriage does not seem that important. However some of us believe and hope to end all discrimination, and Marriage is a powerful symbol of one of the last great areas for those who believe in it. I would also like to see if I had a priority, the Federal Equal Opportunity Act changed to include us without exemptions, so we can challenge any further legislation that discriminates, that we might so come accross in our lives, from nursing homes, to health care, to family court, to schools, businesses that get government money but discriminate. I mean how bad is it some of us cannot even work in soup kitchen if we are open about our sexuality!

]]>