Polyamory is not our business
Guest column
Karl Hand is the Pastor of Crave Metropolitan Community Church () and co-convenor of Community Action Against Homophobia (). He blogs at .
Liberal Senator Cory Bernardi recently reawakened the fear campaign which claims marriage equality will lead to polygamy and bestiality, based on a petition from Sydney鈥檚 Polyamory Action Lobby which called for state recognition of poly families.
I鈥檓 a Christian and a monogamist but I don鈥檛 share Bernardi鈥檚 paranoid fear of our polyamorist friends.
Last year, Alex Greenwich and the Australian Greens distanced themselves from any support for poly relationships. Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young similarly opposed recognition of poly relationships and alienated many members of the Greens, including those who responded by the founding of the Polyamory Action Lobby. Well that backfired, didn鈥檛 it?
I think we鈥檙e going about this all wrong. Those of us involved in the the marriage equality campaign have no need to comment on polyamory. It鈥檚 not our business. We are campaigning for the rights of LGBTI people, and we鈥檙e committed to that demand.
But since the topic has been raised, I want to take the opportunity to say that formalised poly unions are not a threat to civilisation or public morality. Polyamorous people can define what forms that legal recognition ought to take, and for the most part, their radical rejection of traditional relationships makes it doubtful 鈥渕arriage鈥 will be the outcome.
Legislation against plural marriage is a problematic approach to this whole issue. The western criminalisation of bigamy and other plural marriages has not stamped out the practice. While polyamorist relationships are consensual and non-hierarchical, more abusive kinds of plural marriage have thrived under cover of criminality. This has led to the imprisonment of women (through religious brainwashing and manufactured co-dependency more than lock and key) in Fundamentalist Mormon compounds where they are collectively married off at a young age to old men who treat them as chattel.
Even if you oppose this kind of polygamy (which I do), we should decriminalise it so we can put some brakes on it. Let the polygamous families register their marriages so that these women could be liberated without abandoning their children and fleeing in poverty and social disgrace. They could have recourse to divorce courts and retain custody: the family patriarch鈥檚 worst nightmare. Empowered wives are just the thing to break their creepy business model. Polyamorous people are no threat to anyone. Let鈥檚 understand what Bernardi is doing: dividing us by demonising certain people to torpedo the marriage equality movement. We should be smart enough to see right through him.