Comments on: Fred Nile says radical gay sex education will be the “next step”

By: NickDavisGB

NickDavisGB — Thu, 26 Oct 2017 09:48:00 +0000

#MakeChurchesPayTax

By: Michael

Michael — Thu, 26 Oct 2017 03:12:17 +0000

Some people are childless, so WHAT…

By: Michael

Michael — Thu, 26 Oct 2017 03:09:19 +0000

Whats wrong with sex its healthy whether you are atheist agnostic or religious

By: Arthur

Arthur — Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:08:58 +0000

and also add,
The No campaign will ensure that every married couple without children will have their marriages revoked since they are not aiding in the procreation of children.

By: margaret handasyde

margaret handasyde — Wed, 25 Oct 2017 07:10:29 +0000

Poor old FRED!. He used to be known as Fred Vile from the Festival of FRIGHT. Prays every Mardi Gras for God to make it rain and it never has yet.

By: Gerry

Gerry — Wed, 25 Oct 2017 06:44:09 +0000

Really, they say that they (the NO Campaign) have been harassed and spat at and not been allowed to have there say or been listened to. Well, seriously with lies and crap like this article coming from Nile, I would not blame anybody from slapping his face. The NO campaign have run a disgraceful campaign but it was to be expected. The Anglican Church has allot to answer for especially its Archbishop for misusing church funds to the tune of $1M. Big governance issues here I think, especially when they lost over $100M playing the market a few years back and nearly had to sell the farm. Now in the final hours the NO Campaign wheel out old Fred with his zimmer frame. Shows what a tragic state politics is in when a man who has been so totally wrong re public policy, and has become a dinosaur in most peoples eyes, is still allowed to milk the public purse. Nile you really contribute nothing to public debate anymore so just retire.

By: Dave

Dave — Wed, 25 Oct 2017 01:37:30 +0000

Well since there’s no longer a need for any factual basis of these sorts of claims, I’m pretty comfortable predicting the following:

1. When the No campaign win, every single parent and divorced/remarried parent will be forced by the armed forces to return to the biological co-parent of their kid. After all, it’s all about the rights of children and kids need their mum and dad.
2. The No campaign will ensure that everyone who is not a parent will be shot to death. Why not? They’re not advancing the rights of children, let’s face it, what value to they have?
3. Any kids who have lost their parents because they’ve been killed by the military for refusing to go back to their ex will be raised by Catholic priests. They completely understand family values, what could possibly go wrong?

I’ve formed these views based on the media-reported claims of the No campaign, their signs at rallies and their advertising. And it’s about as likely to be true as what Fred Nile is crapping on about.