Comments on: Marriage worth $136m to Tassie

By: Andrew Sinclair

Andrew Sinclair — Thu, 06 Oct 2011 02:57:02 +0000

for or against gay marriage no one can argue that the Tasmanian economy would not gain from becoming the first state. Andrew Sinclair Brisbane Civil Marriage Celebrant

By: Marriage worth $136m to Tassie – Sydney Star Observer | Australia Honeymoon

Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:08:30 +0000

[…] Marriage worth $ 136m to TassieSydney Star Observer… that 87 percent of Australian same-sex couples who would like to marry would marry in Tasmania if it was the first state to allow same-sex marriages, and that 60 percent of these would spend over $ 10000 on their Tasmanian wedding and honeymoon. …Tassie MPs set to vote for equal marriageSame SameLabor backs Greens motion on Tas marriage equalityBlazeall 158 news articles » […]

By: David Skidmore

David Skidmore — Fri, 23 Sep 2011 06:43:49 +0000

It seems anti-gay bigotry not only leads to obsession with same-sex marriage but very bad spelling as well.

By: davo

davo — Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:20:50 +0000

Dear Diane,

when you stated “I am very simple” you hit the nail right on the head and need not bother saying anything else, we know all we need to know about you. I will pray for you and your simpleton friends.

Blessings

By: Celebrants Online-development site » Today’s Links September 21, 2011

Celebrants Online-development site » Today’s Links September 21, 2011 — Wed, 21 Sep 2011 01:50:06 +0000

[…] Marriage worth $136m to Tassie – Sydney Star Observer […]

By: Dave

Dave — Tue, 20 Sep 2011 23:42:50 +0000

Dianne if you wish to spend your life in the hating, and believing a conspiracy of scientist and doctors are out to get you, along with the lesbian cows that make that milk you have in your tea, then I feel sorry for you.

By: Dianne

Dianne — Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:37:06 +0000

No ammount of money can make same sex marriage right – it just turns marriage into a product for sale. I will never be for same sex marriage and I am not interested in the arguments – they are so boringingly selfish and hedonistic. Namely “Its all about me the person with same sex orieintation and what I want.”

Where is the care for the wider community and the future world in that. Same sex marraige is about what “I want” at the expense of both genders. Sorry I don’t buy it.

In the end same sex marraige may come but in my heart I will always be against it till the day I die.

I see same sex attraction as a cop out and that’s the truth – its much harder to love someone who is opposite to you and the opposite sex is opposite to you. The opportunity of marriage as it currently stands is that it brings together the strenghs of both genders that make up the human race to create a society that moves forward to raise the next generation apreciating the that the human race comprises both males and females.

I am opposed to same sex marraige because it extols one gender at the expense of the other. I am very simple in that regard and I am sure many people are just as simplistic as me.

Same sex attration is in my opinion evidence of arrested human development. It is evidence of a failure to achieve sexual maturity. Thats what I really think. I believe I am not alone in my thoughs on this one.

Marriage dollars could flow to Tassie! – this is just a chep grab for money – some things are not worth buying.

By: Dave

Dave — Tue, 20 Sep 2011 05:14:55 +0000

It was so nice to see Alex Greenwich ask a question on Q and A on Monday night, and to see Kristina Keneally argue with Jim Wallace for marriage equality for the GLBTI community. I think Jim Wallace just moved a million more Australians towards equality with his outburst against not just us, but the rest of the community such as single mothers and fathers. For more information http://www.abc.net.au/tv/qanda/txt/s3316101.htm